🔗 Share this article

In a recent appearance, actor Jude Law stated he had no concerns about backlash for portraying Vladimir Putin in a new film. The movie, though, may align so closely with the mythologized version circulated by official channels that, domestically, it reads as a endorsement instead of a challenge.

The Crafted Superhero

For years, the Kremlin and its pop-culture machine have worked together to forge a made-to-measure persona of the president. This figure is a political superhero without age or mistakes, an ex-intelligence officer reimagined as a Russian James Bond who consistently understands beyond what he shows.

“In Russia, the manufactured Putin has long eclipsed the actual person.”

Cinematic Reinforcement

A notable instance is a TV series launched last October, helmed by a pro-government filmmaker. Its main character is a fictional blue-eyed lieutenant colonel selected by fate to “save” the nation from chaos. Although the character's name a different name, the implication is unmistakable: the savior must be a familiar security officer.

International depictions frequently result in buttressing this same narrative instead of undercutting it. A new film based on a popular book aims to undermine the leader's mythology by framing him as a symptom but as a consequence, moving the focus to the spin doctors around him.

The Myth of the Reluctant Leader

On screen, Putin is shown as having been chosen by powerful oligarchs to steady the nation because he is “a fit former intelligence agent”. They visit him and practically plead him to become president. His response is that he would prefer to rule from the shadows, seeking enduring influence.

This tale is a key piece of state propaganda: the cool, reluctant strategist guided by fate. Historically, none of this took place.

The Reality of the Casting Call

No one ever begged him to take the job. The position was in essence a selection process with no shortage of candidates. At the centre to this process stood an influential oligarch from the Yeltsin era who planned to control the state de facto.

• The shortlist included various figures, among them an opposition leader subsequently assassinated and a security service director.
• Per an expert who studied Putin’s biography, the chosen candidate simply fitted the required parameters: obedient, from the intelligence world, and not a communist or a liberal.
• A property developer close to the process said the key criterion was controllability and faithfulness, not leadership.

“The goal wasn't a powerful leader, they needed someone controllable, someone who would obey orders.”

Building the 007 Persona

Analysts concur that the notion of him as a powerful KGB spy was constructed retrospectively. Stories about his clandestine activities in East Germany fall apart under examination. In essence, he handled paperwork and routine duties, a mid-level functionary not engaged in actual agent work.

Interestingly, the shift to framing him as a “007” could partly have been triggered by Daniel Craig’s arrival as James Bond. The grittier version led local outlets and online audiences to draw visual parallels with their leader. Mashup posters swapping Craig’s face with Putin’s surfaced on Moscow streets, fueling the growing tendency to see him as a local secret agent.

A Diplomatic Opportunity?

With Jude Law, an star well-liked by viewers there, the Kremlin will not miss the opportunity to portray this choice as a small victory. The film's omission of public dissent, the opposition, or key figures in the story, even though it includes the past decade, is a welcome aspect for state propaganda.

Domestically, the president is often an omnipotent figure who remains unseen directly. He is signaled through photographs or orders from on high. In this new film, he at last gets a recognizable face—one that may inadvertently echo the very myths it perhaps aims to question.