🔗 Share this article

In a unsigned ruling, the highest judicial body cleared the way for Texas to employ a newly configured congressional district plan that may create as many as five new GOP-friendly districts. The 6-3 order, handed down on Thursday, grants a request by the state to set aside a district court's ruling that had struck down the new map in November.

Justices' Reasoning

The federal judge erroneously placed itself into an active primary campaign, causing significant confusion and disturbing the fine balance of power in elections, the justices wrote in detailing its decision.

The district court had determined that Texas had probably grouped voters by their race – a method known as unconstitutional racial sorting – when it passed the boundaries. It had mandated the state to revert to the maps established after the last decennial survey for the forthcoming election.

Strong Dissenting Opinion

In a strongly worded objection, Justice Elena Kagan took issue with the majority's action. She argued that it disrespected the work of the district court, observing that its opinion was crafted by a judge nominated by former President Donald Trump.

We are a higher court than the district court, but we are not a better one when it comes to making such a fact-based decision, Kagan stated in a opinion supported by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

She continued, Today's ruling guarantees that Texas's new map, with all its boosted favoritism, will control next year's elections. And it means that many Texas voters, for no good reason, will be grouped in electoral districts due to their race. And that result, as this court has declared consistently, is a violation of the constitution.

Countrywide Map-Drawing Battle

This decision comes amid a countrywide battle over the redistricting of electoral maps. Texas is a key piece in campaigns to transform the U.S. House map to secure a fragile Republican majority. Ordinarily, redistricting happens after a new decade's census. Yet the action by Texas Republicans to proceed with a brazen off-cycle redistricting earlier this year set off a chain reaction among other states.

Republicans in including North Carolina and Missouri have also enacted new maps that might create several more GOP-friendly seats. Democrats, meanwhile, have pushed back with new maps in including California and Virginia, which could offset those projected gains.

Political Reactions

Lone Star State top lawyer hailed the High Court's decision. In a release, he said the order protected Texas's prerogative to draw a map that guarantees electoral outcomes favorable to the GOP. Our state is leading the charge to reclaim the nation, one district and one state at a time, he stated.

In contrast, Democratic leaders decried the ruling. The Court's approval of this extreme, racially gerrymandered Texas GOP map is profoundly disappointing, said the chair of a major Democratic campaign committee.

Another senior Democratic leader argued the court had yet again damaged its standing by rubber-stamping a race-based map. This decision from the Court's far-right bloc proves extremists are willing to rig elections. The Texas map is a discriminatory power grab targeting Black and Latino voters, he concluded.